Biographer – My Custom Essay Writers Thu, 04 Aug 2022 13:27:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Biographer – My Custom Essay Writers 32 32 Meghan Markle’s biographer slams William’s ‘puzzling’ stance against Diana’s interview | royal | New Thu, 04 Aug 2022 13:27:00 +0000

Princess Diana was a ‘change from within’, royals say

Omid Scobie, co-author of the flattering but unauthorized 2020 biography of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex titled Finding Freedom, called a “bold statement” Prince William’s claim made in May last year that the Princess of Wales’ interview with Panorama has “zero legitimacy” given the means by which it was obtained and had “established a false narrative”. The royal expert believes the BBC must have been punished for Mr Bashir’s behavior and the way it conducted the ensuing investigation.

However, he described as “puzzling” the decision announced in July by the company’s chief executive, Tim Davie, to no longer allow the footage to be released for public consumption.

The Panorama interview, Mr Scobie said, is “one of the few first-person accounts” of Princess Diana’s life.

Mr Davie’s decision was likely welcomed by Prince William, who, in a searing statement dated May 20, 2021, following the publication of the Dyson investigation into how Mr Bashir won a program exclusive with the Princess of Wales, said the interview “should never be re-aired”.

Referring to this statement from the Duke, Mr Scobie wrote in an op-ed for Yahoo! News, “That’s a bold statement, and one that I disagree with given that the majority of Diana’s Panorama revelations were already in [Andrew] Morton’s Book of Years Earlier.

Prince William said in May last year that Diana’s interview with Panorama should never be aired again (Image: GETTY)

Princess Diana speaking to Martin Bashir

Princess Diana was interviewed by Martin Bashir in 1995 (Image: GETTY)

“But our differences of opinion are exactly why it’s important for the public to have access to such a historically significant interview.

“Without being able to hear Diana’s own words again, I fear we are about to enter what could potentially lead to the slow rewrite of her life.

“After all, with stories about her suffering at the hands of the royal family and why she thought Charles was unfit to become king, there are many aspects of this interview that the institution would like to be forgotten.”

The author said the media should be challenged if they engage in immoral or unethical practices.

READ MORE: Royal Family: ‘I wanted the title’, Meghan’s hopes dashed

Omid Scobie smiling

Omid Scobie co-wrote Finding Freedom (Image: GETTY)

However, at the same time freedom of speech should be given to those “repressed or silenced by higher powers”, Mr Scobie said.

The royal biographer went on to say that the late princess struggled for much of her life in the royal family to ‘share her side of the story’ and inspired millions as she found the courage to talk.

He added: “Unfortunately his voice was silenced again.”

The author noted how Princess Diana wrote, just weeks after her explosive interview aired, a letter to Mr Bashir saying she had “no regrets” about appearing on Panorama.

The message was dated December 22, 1995 and featured the Princess’s monogram.


Princess Diana standing in front of Harry and William children

Princess Diana with her sons Harry and William at Kensington Palace (Image: GETTY)

Prince William and Kate walking side by side

Prince William has issued a statement following the publication of the Lord Dyson report (Image: GETTY)

He said, “Martin Bashir did not show me any documents or give me any information that I was not aware of before.

“I consented to the interview on Panorama without any undue pressure and I have no regrets about it.”

The memo was written after BBC executives asked Mr Bashir to provide evidence that Diana had not been given fake bank statements when he tried to gain access to her.

In his report published last year, Lord Dyson found that Mr Bashir had shown false documents to Earl Spencer, the Princess’s younger brother, to gain his trust and be introduced to him.

Princess Diana and Prince Charles' romance charted

Princess Diana and Prince Charles divorced in 1996 (Picture: EXPRESS)

Among other findings, Lord Dyson also said that by accessing in this way, the journalist was able to persuade Prince Charles’ then-wife to agree to give the interview.

The report added that the BBC covered up what it learned about how Mr Bashir got the interview and described the broadcaster’s internal investigation in 1996 into what happened was ‘wretchedly ineffective’. .

In his raw video statement released following the publication of Lord Dyson’s report, William said the interview contributed significantly to both the breakdown of his parents’ marriage and to “fear, paranoia and isolation” of the princess in the last years of her life.

He also said: “It brings indescribable sadness to know that the failures of the BBC have contributed significantly to her fear, paranoia and isolation that I remember from those last few years with her.

Prince William in suit

Prince William is Diana’s eldest son (Image: GETTY)

“But what saddens me most is that had the BBC properly investigated the complaints and concerns first raised in 1995, my mother would have known she had been cheated.

“She was let down not just by a rogue journalist, but by BBC executives who looked the other way rather than ask the hard questions.”

Last month the BBC agreed to pay ‘substantial damages’ to William and Harry’s former nanny, Tiggy Legge-Bourke, after Mr Bashir made unfounded allegations about her as he tried to get his interview with Diana.

Harry and Meghan’s biographer Omid Scobie says his sequel will ‘get the world talking’ | Books Mon, 01 Aug 2022 16:12:00 +0000

Journalist Omid Scobie will publish a sequel to his bestseller Finding Freedom, an unofficial biography of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.

Scobie, co-author of Finding Freedom with journalist Carolyn Durand, has yet to reveal the title of the second book, which is due out next year.

Its UK publisher HarperCollins said the book will focus on “a new chapter in royal history and feature unique insight, in-depth access and exclusive revelations”, and will “get the world talking”.

Finding Freedom, which was a hit in the UK and US, was described in its blurb as “an honest, close and disarming portrait of a confident, influential and forward-thinking couple who have no not afraid to break with tradition”. ”.

Although it has been revealed that Meghan, Duchess of Sussex has authorized a senior assistant to brief Scobie and Durand for the first book, there is no indication so far that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will be involved in this. second volume.

Reviewing Finding Freedom for the Guardian, Hadley Freeman wrote that “given the deluge of personal minutia – from Harry’s emoji habit to Meghan’s favorite shades of hair highlights – as well as their contentiousness regarding concerns unwanted invasions of privacy,” the claim that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were not involved did not seem credible.

In his review, Freeman wrote: “The Sussexes have been run dry by the palace and the press; the question the book doesn’t answer is why, when they were such a boon to the brand…Finding Freedom has the space to address all the other media claims, but on this point it remains schtum.

Scobie is Editor-in-Chief (Royals) at Yahoo News UK and Editor-in-Chief at Harpers Bazaar US. The book is one of a number of publications about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex over the coming year.

Prince Harry’s own memoir is expected to be released later this year, although it currently has no title or official release date. Publisher Penguin Random House, when it announced the book in the summer of 2021, said it was “tentatively scheduled for release in late 2022”. Prince Harry said he wrote the book “not as the prince I was born but as the man I became”, and described it as “a first-hand account of my life which is accurate and entirely truthful”.

News of Scobie’s new book comes just after the publication of biographer Tom Bower’s Revenge, subtitled Meghan, Harry and the War Between the Windsors. The blurb for the book says Bower – who has also written biographies of Boris Johnson, Prince Charles and Tony Blair – “unravels the tangled web of court drama, courtier politics and thwarted childhood dreams to uncover an amazing story of love, betrayal, secrets and revenge. ”. Markle’s estranged father, Thomas Markle, was interviewed for Bower’s book.

Prince William accused of muzzling Diana by biographer who told his story Mon, 01 Aug 2022 13:09:10 +0000

Prince William ‘led calls to muzzle Diana posthumously’ when he denounced an explosive 1995 interview she gave to the BBC, said biographer Andrew Morton, whose 1992 book Diana: her true story revealed Prince Charles’ affair with Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, for the first time.

Princess Diana told the BBC Panorama, “there were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded” in her most famous media appearance at the height of the disintegration of her relationship with Charles.

However, Prince William has since requested that the show never air again after controversy surrounding how journalist Martin Bashir got the scoop. And it looks like he may get his wish, at least in part, after the BBC pledged not to show it in its entirety or license it to other broadcasters.

However, Morton recently said The daily beast the 1995 interview was a historical artifact and should be part of the public record.

“It is a supreme irony that it was her son who led the calls to muzzle Diana posthumously, to silence her, to prevent her from being heard, from saying what she has spent her life trying to articulate,” Morton said.

William says Diana’s interview ‘has no legitimacy’

Diana’s 1995 Panorama The interview was mired in controversy after it emerged Bashir had used fake financial documents as part of a campaign to get the scoop of the decade.

According to an internal investigation carried out on behalf of the BBC by Lord John Dyson.

The Duke of Cambridge responded to the report’s publication in 2021 by calling Diana’s interview a “false narrative” that should never be aired again.

In a rare moving statement, he said: “I think the misleading manner in which the interview was obtained significantly influenced what my mother said. The interview was a major contributor to the worsening of the relationship of my parents and has since hurt countless others.

“It brings indescribable sadness to know that the failures of the BBC contributed significantly to her fear, paranoia and isolation that I remember from those last few years with her.”

“I strongly believe that this Panorama program has no legitimacy and should never be broadcast again,” William added. “He effectively established a false narrative which for over a quarter of a century has been marketed by the BBC and others. This established narrative must now be addressed by the BBC and anyone else who has written or intention to write about these events.

Prince William, seen at the Platinum Jubilee on June 5, 2022, has said his mother Princess Diana’s November 1995 BBC interview should never be shown again. The princess is pictured on a tour of Argentina five days after the story first aired.
Max Momby/Indigo/Getty Images

BBC Director General Tim Davie appeared to largely comply with William’s request when he confirmed in July 2022 that the BBC would no longer license footage to other broadcasters and would only show clips in limited circumstances.

“Now that we know the shocking way in which the interview was obtained, I have decided that the BBC will never carry the show again, nor will we license it in whole or in part to other broadcasters. “Davie said in a statement. “This of course remains part of the historical archive and there may be occasions in the future where it will be justified for the BBC to use short extracts for journalistic purposes.

“But these will be rare and will need to be agreed at executive committee level and placed in the full context of what we now know about how the interview was obtained.”

What Diana said was ‘not an aberration’

However, Morton pointed to the fact that at least some of what Diana described to Bashir had already been included in the secret tapes she made for him for his 1992 book.

The Princess smuggled a taped confession to the author through an intermediary containing a devastating account of Charles’ affair, his experiences with bulimia and several suicide attempts during his time in the royal family.

This testimony came three years before Bashir’s interview, and a transcript of these tapes appeared in later editions of Morton’s book published after Diana’s death.

Prince William has never said which aspects of Diana’s interview he believes represent a “false narrative”, making it difficult to determine the extent to which Morton’s recordings challenge his view.

morton said The daily beast: “This [Panorama] is an important and historic interview that should be part of the public record. No accurate story or documentary about Diana can be made without reference to this interview.

“What she said was no aberration; indeed much of the ground she covered had been revealed in my book, Diana, her true story. For the BBC, locking it in a safe is a mistake.”

“The methods Martin Bashir used to get Diana to sit down and talk to him were underhanded and deceptive,” Morton continued, “but the truth is that once the cameras rolled, he didn’t twist her neck. arms to say anything, and many of the things she said, such as talking about her bulimia, her suicide attempts, her husband’s relationship with Camilla Parker Bowles and the fact that she didn’t consider him fit to be king, were not aberrations.

“She was well known for saying these things to those around her, to the extent that they had become something of a schtick.”

Princess Diana’s “paranoia”

Prince William didn’t say what he was specifically referring to when he used the term ‘paranoia’, but Bashir’s false account erroneously suggested that Charles also had an affair with his children’s nanny, so known as Tiggy Legge-Bourke.

The nanny, now Tiggy Pettifer, has been awarded damages by the BBC for Bashir’s false account that she had an abortion after Prince Charles impregnated her.

Lord Dyson’s 2021 report said: “I am satisfied that at the time of the meeting [with Bashir]Princess Diana had paranoid fears about various things, including that she was being spied on and in mortal danger.

“Mr. Bashir was aware of some of these fears, but the Princess had expressed a number of fears for her physical safety prior to her death, the report added. “Mr. Bashir would have little trouble playing on his fears and paranoia.”

For more royal news and commentary, check out Newsweekit is The royal report podcast:

Blake Bailey: Biographer accused of rape gets book deal for memoir billed as ‘cancellation culture warning tale’ Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:04:12 +0000

Biographer Blake Bailey, who faces multiple allegations of sexual harassment and abuse, has now been signed to publish a memoir on so-called cancel culture by publishing house Skyhorse.

The allegations against Bailey surfaced last April, two weeks after her biography on Philip Roth was published. The allegations were made by former students who had been taught by Bailey when he was a middle school teacher in New Orleans in the 1990s.

Students have publicly stated that he engaged in inappropriate behavior while teaching and then pursued sexual relationships. Two former students and book publishing executive Valentina Rice alleged he assaulted them.

Bailey, who has also written acclaimed biographies of authors John Cheever and Richard Yates, has denied any wrongdoing. The American author claimed he had consensual sex with some former students, while his lawyer said the allegations were “false and unsubstantiated”.

His new memoirs Repulsive, was presented as a warning about “cancellation culture”.

According to the Skyhorse ad, Repulsive presents a “provocative account of the private Philip Roth and his biographer, as well as a lucid examination of the perils faced by any writer or artist – fallible human beings, after all – in the age of cancel culture”.

“In the age of cancel culture, get a behind-the-scenes look at the journey to critically acclaimed success Philip Roth: the biography and its subject and author ‘cancelled’,” he adds.

According to the publishing house, “worrying forces were at work” and “because of the revelations in Bailey’s biography, many were calling for Philip Roth and his work to be ‘cancelled’, while others seemed to think Bailey had been too sympathetic and even ‘conniving’ with his subject’s worst faults’.

Referring to reports of allegations of sexual harassment against the author, the editors said: “Rumors exploded on the internet about Bailey’s private life, and within days he himself was downright canceled.”

Publishing giant Simon & Schuster, which has struck a deal with Skyhorse to distribute its titles, said the memoir will be sold on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Bam!, Bookshop and Indie Bound for $26.99 (22 ,£16).

Last year, Skyhorse Publishing published Philip Roth: the biography after its initial publisher WW Norton and Company withdrew it following the allegations against Bailey.

Skyhorse also published a memoir by Trump attorney Michael Cohen, as well as Woody Allen’s memoir. About nothing.

The latter book had been abandoned by Hachette Book Group after employees staged a walkout to protest its publication. Allen’s daughter, Dylan Farrow, alleged he sexually abused her when she was seven, an allegation Allen has always vehemently denied.

With Putin in power, ‘no one will be safe,’ says biographer John Sweeney Sun, 24 Jul 2022 14:17:05 +0000

“I think what Ukrainians teach us is that democracy must be protected and freedom of expression is not guaranteed. I think we should pay attention to what is happening in Ukraine,” Sweeney told Agencia Lusa about the release of the book “Killer in the Kremlin.” [“Assassino no Kremlin”].

“For too long we have lived too comfortably and become a bit ‘zombified’. But Russia remains a threat. No one will be safe as long as Putin is in power. According to Sweeney, who was in Kyiv on February 24 when the Russia has launched its military offensive against Ukraine.

The book, said to be an “explosive account of Putin’s reign of terror”, is the result of the former spy and current president’s 22 years since the war in Chechnya in the 2000s, saying he “has found evidence of war crimes committed by the Russian army”. .

In 2014, he traveled to Siberia to interview the Russian president for the BBC, asking him about the “deaths in Ukraine”, in reference to the downing of flight MH17, which killed 298 people.

A Malaysia Airlines flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur was hit by a missile while flying over eastern Ukraine at the height of the conflict over the annexation of Crimea.

“There is no doubt that MH17 was shot down in the air by the Russian military,” said Sweeney, who investigated the crash for Britain’s public broadcaster, despite denials from Moscow.

Putin responded by accusing kyiv of not wanting “a substantial political dialogue with the east of the country”. A few months later, Russia supports the breakaway Ukrainian republics of Donetsk and Luhansk and annexes the Crimean peninsula.

In 2018, Sweeney returned to the subject, exploring the Putin ties of Russian oligarchs who frequented the UK and the Kremlin connections of businessman Aaron Banks, one of Nigel Farage’s allies and financiers during of the Brexit referendum.

More recently, he has written about the close relationship between Prime Minister Boris Johnson and former Russian spy Alexander Lebedev, whose son Yevgeny, owner of the Evening Standard and Independent newspapers, entered the House of Lords with the title of Baron Lebedev of Hampton, Richmond. London, Thames and Siberia, in the Russian Federation.

The book contains information used for all of this work, as well as the “Talking on Putin” podcast. [“Falando sobre Putin”]Sweeney launched crowdfunding in February [crowdfunding] From Kyiv.

Since leaving the BBC in 2019, Sweeney, 64, has continued to work as a freelance journalist and author of several books, which has also given him greater freedom.

The new book traces Putin’s journey through those who knew him, experts and opponents alike, and covers a number of unproven theories, from the illness that allegedly afflicted Vladimir Putin to rumors of pedophilia and bisexuality.

On the much-talked-about facial disfigurement of Russian President John F. As happened to Kennedy, he says, it could be the result of too much steroids from treating Addison’s disease, which which could increase side effects. Occupied.

But this does not mean that Putin has gone mad, he remembered a conversation with a psychiatrist.

“He’s bad, but not crazy. He doesn’t have a voice in his head, he’s not hallucinating,” he argues, which is good news because it means he’s not going to bomb us.

Before invading Ukraine, Putin had already launched attacks on the international order and Western democracies, and the book’s influence on ‘Brexit’ is in doubt, despite several official British investigations finding no evidence.

“None of these surveys is qualitative. Really competent people [os serviços de inteligência britânicos] MI6 and they weren’t asked to investigate,” he told Lusa, adding that the ruling Conservative Party was not interested.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson acknowledges the merits of a confrontation between Russia and Putin “since February 24”, but has stopped criticizing previous links with the oligarchs, such as attending parties at the Lebedev mansion in Italy.

“The relationship with the Lebedevs is irrelevant. Alexander Lebedev is from the KGB [o KGB] It’s like Hotel California,” he says, referencing the Eagles song, “You Can Never Leave.”

David Dalton, Rolling Stone writer and rock biographer, dies at 80 Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:58:30 +0000

David Dalton, one of the first rolling stone writer who profiled Janis Joplin, Charles Manson and Little Richard before penning biographies of some of pop culture’s most important figures, died Monday in New York City at the age of 80. According to his son, Toby Dalton, the cause of death was cancer, The New York Times reported.

Born John David Dalton on January 15, 1942, Dalton grew up in London and British Columbia before eventually following his parents to the United States in the sixties. He soon found himself immersed in New York’s burgeoning underground art scene where, along with his sister, Dalton began working as an assistant to Andy Warhol. (Dalton would later immortalize the legendary artist in his book Pop: the genius of Andy Warhol, co-written with Tony Scherman, some 50 years later.) His closeness to Warhol and the glitzy cast of the Factory led the young Dalton to begin photographing British Invasion bands and other artists. After learning about the creation of rolling stone in 1967 Dalton began sending his photographs to co-founder Jann Wenner.

“He was taking pictures of bands like the Shangri-Las, and Jann wanted captions,” Dalton’s wife Coco Pekelis said. Time. “So David started writing. And writes and writes and writes. I asked him the other day when he knew he was a writer, and he said, when his captions got longer and longer.

Among Dalton’s most notable works during his time at rolling stone was a multi-part feature film portraying counterculture cult leader and criminal mastermind Charles Manson, written in conjunction with former Los Angeles Times journalist David Felton. The tell-all article, which included a prison interview with Manson, won the two a National Magazine Award in 1971.

Dalton’s August 6, 1970 cover story featuring Janis Joplin on tour with her new Full Tilt Boogie Band would mark one of the last major interviews with the groundbreaking singer before her death in October of that year. Dalton’s time with Joplin would lead him to write the 1972 biography Janisincluding an excerpt featuring Joplin ruminating on the life of Zelda and F. Scott Fitzgerald, was published in rolling stone. Dalton would also cover Elvis Presley’s Las Vegas Shows series in 1970 and pen a tell-all cover on R&B legend Little Richard the same year.

After his time with rolling stone, Dalton continued to write biographies – driven mostly in part by his growing sense of mortality. “When I was writing rock journalism, I was younger,” he wrote in an unpublished autobiography quoted by the Time. “I was involved in the scene as it unfolded, evolved. I went anywhere at the drop of a hat. When I hit my thirties, I started writing about the past and have lived there since. In addition to his biography of Joplin, later renamed Piece of My Heart: A Portrait of Janis Joplinhis published works included The Rolling Stones: An Unauthorized Biography, The Beatles: Come Back, James Dean: The Mutant Kingand Who is that man? In search of the real Bob Dylan. Dalton has also helped musicians write their own autobiographies, including that of Marianne Faithfull Faithfull: An Autobiography, Meatloaf: To Hell and Backby Steven Tyler Does the noise in my head bother you?and Paul Anka My path.

Dalton is survived by his wife, son and sister.

Famed biographer James Gavin tackles George Michael’s legacy Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:20:47 +0000

“If you can’t find your empathy with your subject, you shouldn’t write the book.”

This resonant line was spoken to me by James Gavin – whose in-depth new biography of the late George Michael has just received acclaim. It doesn’t take more than a few minutes of talking with Mr. Gavin to quickly realize he’s getting the late music icon.

Mr. Gavin grabs our hand and leads us with clear eyes through the waters of all things George Michael. These waters are murky, deep, and often turbulent – far more so than perhaps even the most dedicated fan would ever imagine.

As dark as the tale may get in parts, it leaves us not in distress but with a clarity that comes from a far greater understanding and appreciation of one of the greatest and most gifted singer-songwriters in our time.

Q: You are a prolific writer-journalist on a wide variety of subjects, but so far your literary work has been entirely devoted to jazz and cabaret. What drew you to George Michael as a subject?

“What drew me so deeply to George was that I realized during the ‘Older’ days that this guy was in a lot of pain, that he was lost and that clues existed in this album and really in all the music he did after that. I saw this huge confusion.

“What was I looking for in telling this story? An honest account of a beautiful talent who was struggling and couldn’t bear the pain of never liking what he saw in the mirror. How all the factors that drove him to become the biggest pop star in the world for a while also pushed him to destroy everything.

Q: How did you start?

“It’s always daunting to let family or heirs know that you, that stranger, are now going to write a book about their loved one because you’ll be instantly suspicious, at least most of the time. The first year or so of this book was really tough because people either wouldn’t respond to me or they said no, because I guess the aforementioned reason of distrust, but also because George’s death was so recent that I think some were still raw to her, and not particularly inclined to talk.

Q: The book was initially rejected by many publishers, why?

“All of this, I guess, tells you something about how George Michael was perceived, despite his death. I think he was seen as some sort of faded 80s pop star who had fallen out of favor. And he wasn’t seen as eternally cool like Bowie and Lou Reed and Leonard Cohen and Prince, who all died around the same time.

Q: The buzz at the start of the book focused almost entirely on the sex and drug parts, how does that make you feel?

It was painful for me to see the descriptions in my book as a bunch of garbage because that was all I had been fighting against.

Q: Your portrayal of George’s childhood friend and other half of Wham!, Andrew Ridgeley, is completely honest. Have you spoken with him?

“No to both questions. He hates giving interviews. When he was forced to give interviews because of the publication of his memoirs, he seemed very uncomfortable, very tense and very unrevealing too. I think Wham! was a lark to him. He wasn’t doing the heavy lifting, but on the other hand, if it wasn’t for Andrew, there wouldn’t have been a Wham! and not George, because Andrew’s sense of style and attitude at the time were role models for George, who was a pimply nerd.

Q: George Michael has been underestimated for his songwriting skills. You quote George Martin and Elton John on different occasions describing his writing on par with that of Paul McCartney.

“One of the interesting things about his childhood is that he was such a voracious student of pop music from the past, especially Motown and R&B, although his focus was always on pop. wasn’t rock and roll. George wasn’t much into rock. He liked pop because he understood that it was wide-ranging, that it was ingeniously designed and appealing, that it transcended age and language barriers. He wanted nothing less than everyone to like him. And George would listen to the records of Supremes and Smokey Robinson, and he would analyze them and sort them out in his brain. And he understood the mechanics of writing songs like that. And he welcomed them all.

Q: While researching the book, was there one thing you came across that surprised you the most?

“I was surprised and saddened by the depth of George’s self-loathing, really.”

“He set out to destroy himself as methodically as he set out to create himself, but I’m glad that in the end he is not seen as a tragic figure and that the happy aspects of George Michael and the good feelings that George Michael sired won. They don’t always do it, you know.

Q: Do you have a favorite George Michael song?

“Without a doubt, my favorite George Michael track and song is ‘Spinning the Wheel’ on the ‘Older’ album. I think that track is a masterpiece. didn’t pay attention.

• Christian Josi is a seasoned political operative, writer and media consultant. He is the former executive director of the American Conservative Union and CPAC, and is currently the managing director of C. Josi and Company, a Virginia Beach-based public affairs and media consulting firm.

• • •

George Michael: A Life (Abrams, June 28, 2022)
By James Gavin
528 pages

Harvey’s Biographer Tells All – Puck Mon, 11 Jul 2022 02:42:31 +0000

The moment I heard that Ken Auletta attended every day Harvey Weinstein rape trial for a book about the tycoon, I started looking forward End of Hollywood: Harvey Weinstein and the culture of silence (released July 12). Ken, the longtime New Yorker writer, conducted several hundred interviews, including dozens of conversations with Bob Weinsteinformer Miramax and Weinstein Co. employees and longtime advisers, such as Joe Ravitch, Fields Bert and David Boyes. And he exchanged emails with Harvey himself from prison. The result is the opposite of She says Where catch and kill, both of which read like mystery novels. Auletta tells the story of Harvey from the on the inside, naming the names of enablers and revealing Hollywood’s “collusion architecture” along the way. I interviewed Ken and followed up with a few emails; an edited version of our conversation is below.

Matt Belloni: You wrote a famous profile of Harvey for the new yorker in 2002 which revealed a lot of abusive behavior but did not go into sexual depravity. I know when I saw the initial Time story in 2017, I felt guilty for not exposing Weinstein sooner. Did you write this book partly because you weren’t able to exhibit it before either?

Ken Auletta: Yes. But guilt is not the overwhelming emotion I felt. In 2002… women weren’t talking to me, so how do you post it? It’s the same problem you had Hollywood journalist. When the Time stories came out [in 2017]and the Ronan Farrow stories, my overwhelming emotion was pleasure. It was applause.

You witnessed every moment of Harvey’s trial and appeal, and you detailed some of the most contentious moments, like the witnesses allowed to testify and juror No. 11, who was recused and stayed. Do you think Harvey got a fair trial?

I thought Weinstein had strong appeal, especially after watching the five female judges aggressively question the prosecutor during the hearing. Judge Burke made questionable decisions: his 23-year sentence was much harsher than sentences he had given in previous rape cases; her decision to allow Juror No. 11 and not delve into the book she was soon to publish, and her decision to allow three Molineux witnesses were controversial.

Given what we’ve seen in the two Bill Cosby trials and Weinstein’s judge’s decision to allow other women to speak about the behavioral model, this seems to be the most effective strategy for getting juries to convict these #MeToo offenders. Do you agree?

Yes and no. Harvey’s appeal was based on the fact that Molineux’s witnesses should not be allowed because they were not part of the indictment. But I would say the most powerful thing to convict Harvey was that the prosecution explained to the jury [why] women who were abused by Harvey nonetheless remained in contact with him and, in some cases, continued to have sex with him. The prosecution has been very successful in overcoming this hurdle.

Much of the book is about who knew what, and when, and who should have known, and who had documents in front of them that showed what was going on. I know a lot of these people, and I winced reading some of this stuff..

I tell the story of a woman who was hired by Harvey. She left a job as an agent on the west coast to come work at Miramax, and the day before her debut, four colleagues offer her a drink. Over a drink, they tell him: “Hillary, don’t come to work here. And she said “Why?” They said, “Because you’re a pretty woman.” Harvey will sexually abuse you. He will attack you. Don’t come to work here. And she didn’t. But it was four people; one worked in HR; one was a Harvey assistant; two were executives in the company. Whether they or they knew, how many other people who worked for Harvey knew?

This brings us to Bob’s question. I actually did the first interview with Bob right after Harvey was exposed, and he was crying, very emotional. Everyone asked me afterwards if I believed him when he said he didn’t know the extent of Harvey’s behavior. I remember saying that I believed he thought he didn’t know, but the evidence was so overwhelming that he should knew, if he did not know explicitly. Now you reveal additional evidence that Bob knew or should have known 100%.

Well, Bob claims he didn’t know, and I have no reason to challenge him. But clearly, he should have known. Go back to 1998, when Rowena Chiu and Zelda Perkins first challenged Harvey for sexual misconduct. They then signed an NDA, but Harvey had to pay them nearly $500,000 to shut them up. As I make room for the New YorkerI say, if i could find out that miramax or disney paid close to $500,000 then i could have the story without the women’s testimony.

Harvey requested a summit meeting with me and David Remnickthe editor of New Yorker. I say, “Harvey, I need to see the canceled checks to find out how that nearly $500,000 was paid.” The next day he returned to the same meeting room at Condé Nast with Bob. And they slipped on the table two canceled checks by Bob. Personal checks. And I asked Bob, “Why did you pay the money to silence these women?” And he said, ‘Because Harvey came to me and said, ‘These women were blackmailing me. And they would ruin my marriage and my three young daughters, and I believed them.

And then Harvey tried to bypass Bob and get him out of the business!

I have the tape of that June 2, 2015 conference call with the board members, where Harvey is literally yelling at them. “Get rid of my brother Bob!” You have to fire him! He is responsible for the losses we face! In fact, Harvey was responsible for those losses, but that’s one of the most amazing things I’ve ever heard.

I’ve been getting texts from people asking me, “Hey, am I in Ken Auletta’s book?” The Harvey Weinstein stench is still quite prevalent. And as you read the book, you see people’s real role in all of this. Steve Hutensky, Meryl Poster, Barbara Schneeweiss and many more. Ken Sunshine, the publicist, is a perfect example. I had no idea Ken was so active in slimming down the Italian model in the press.

There are a lot of people like Ken Sunshine, who I’ve known for years, but he refused to do an interview with me. He said he would, but then he avoided my phone calls and emails. So I’m looking forward to when I run into him on the street, and he’s going to say, “You were unfair to me,” and I’m going to say, “Oh, over to you, buddy.”

How do you think The Weinstein Co. secretly went bankrupt before being saved by Inglourious Basterds in 2009?

Basterds was really important, just like The crying game [for Miramax in 1992]. Before selling to Disney in 1993, Miramax was in serious trouble. crying game was a great commercial success, but also in recruiting two bidders for Miramax: Disney, which was successful, and Ted Turner.

I learned a lot from the book about that uncomfortable Disney marriage.

Michael Eisner could not stand Harvey, nor could Pierre Murphy, its chief strategist. They wanted to get rid of him and attack him. But they kept their mouths shut because they knew Harvey had the press on his side. And they were worried, is there a business if there is no Harvey?

What do you think Disney knew about Harvey’s personal behavior? It has always been an open question.

I pressed them on it, and they said they didn’t know nothing about it. And in fact, a senior Disney executive told me that he had them go through everything and asked: Is there anything we missed here? And he came back to me and said: we didn’t miss anything.

Is it true? I tell you what they say. I can’t prove them [wrong]. But I can say that they should have known. A lot of people should have known. It was so blatant.

People joked about it on stage at the Oscars!

It’s true.

In the 90s, when Perkins and Chiu first brought charges, Harvey said something chilling and fascinating: “Sometimes I don’t know when it’s consensual. Do you think that he believe that?

You are asking an incredibly important and mysterious question here. I can’t get into his mind and I don’t want to play psychopath on a question like that. First, it’s very possible that Harvey thought it was fair trade. The women wanted something from me and I wanted something from them, it was just a transaction. It’s also possible that he’s in total denial, that it never happened. It is also possible, which I do believe to be true, that he is a sociopath.

There are three key ingredients: One is the absence of guilt. I don’t think Harvey was guilty. Two is lack of empathy, and Harvey had no empathy for the women he dealt with. And the third is that you’re narcissistic, and Harvey was clearly narcissistic. Now you can have these three ingredients and not to be a sociopath. But if you have it and you abuse more than 100 women, ipso factoI think you are a sociopath.

Harvey is 70 years old. His appeal failed. He has another trial pending in Los Angeles. Do you think he will spend the rest of his life in prison?

I believe that. His lawyers said they don’t believe Harvey will live a long sentence. He is in terrible physical condition. He has a stenosis, which is why he is in a wheelchair. He takes shots in the eye for macular degeneration. He’s got high cholesterol, a stent in his heart. He has severe diabetes. He takes 20 tablets a day. I always sat in the fourth row in the aisle seat, so I could always have a clear line to Harvey throughout the trial. He is in a terrible state. He would fall asleep during the trial. His face is all scarred and wrinkled, and his beard scruffy and his collar turned up. He’s not Hollywood Harvey.

Meghan Markle’s biographer accuses Prince Charles of ‘suspicious’ new Lilibet plot Wed, 06 Jul 2022 16:30:00 +0000

Queen Elizabeth’s eldest son Prince Charles has been accused of using his first meeting with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s daughter Lilibet to divert public and media attention from more pressing issues .

Omid Scobie, co-author of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s unauthorized biography ‘Finding Freedom’, says Buckingham Palace appears to be abandoning the Queen’s ‘never complain, never explain’ mantra in favor of a “deviate and distract” tactic.

Scobie suggested that the decision to provide reporters with a glimpse of Lili’s first meeting with Prince Charles as the April 2021-2022 financial review was presented helped deflect criticism from the heir to the throne has been confronted after it was reported he personally accepted cash donations for the Prince of Wales Charity Fund from a Qatari politician.

Although Charles has not been charged with any wrongdoing and Clarence House has assured that a similar situation “would not happen again”, some of his critics have raised questions about the judgment of the future king.

The author, in an editorial written for Yahoo! News, writes: “You see, when the Prince of Wales was forced to announce via his spokesman that he would never again accept plastic bags full of €500 banknotes for his charities, one of his top aides also briefed reporters in adorable detail on the heir’s first time meeting his granddaughter Lilibet last month (yes, one of the same private family moments royal sources had ” fears “that the Sussexes will flee. The irony).”

The biographer also qualified the update provided by the Palace regarding the investigation into allegations of bullying made against Prince Harry’s wife, Meghan Markle, by Kensington Palace staff on the same day the report was released financial institution of “suspiciously timed”.

Colonel Tom Parker’s biographer says Hanks’ accent is inaccurate Sun, 26 Jun 2022 18:01:00 +0000

Tom Hanks’ transformation into Elvis wowed audiences, but Colonel Tom Parker’s biographer Alanna Nash says he got the accent wrong.

Colonel Tom Parker’s biographer, Alanna Nash, says Tom Hanks’ accent in Elvis is incorrect. Directed by Baz Luhrmann, the musical drama depicts the life and career of its title character, Elvis Presley, exploring his rise to fame and his journey to becoming the world’s most recognizable rock ‘n roll star. It also delves into Presley’s complicated relationship with his enigmatic manager, Parker. In addition to Hanks, Elvis stars Austin Butler, Olivia DeJonge, Helen Thomson, Richard Roxburgh, Luke Bracey, and more. Elvis premiered on June 24 to mostly positive reviews, with particular praise for Hanks and Butler’s respective performances.


ElvisThe focus on Parker quickly became a topic of discussion among the public, many of whom were unaware of his background or interested in the extent of his relationship with Presley. After emigrating to the United States illegally and concealing his Dutch heritage for years, making his southern accent appear, Parker came into contact with Presley in 1955 before officially starting to manage his career a year later. A controversial figure, he practiced many unethical tactics and took part in almost all of the star’s ventures, including those relating to his personal life. Hanks’ Elvis transformation as Parker shocked fans, as the actor not only looks unrecognizable, but speaks with an accent that is rather unique for the role.

Related: Elvis: The Controversy Behind Colonel Tom Parker Explained

Regarding Hanks’ accent in the film, Nash, a music journalist who wrote The Colonel: The Extraordinary Story of Colonel Tom Parker and Elvis Presleyrecount Variety that it is incorrect. After being asked if the manager’s voice really sounded like Hanks’, Nash replied, “No.“Read Nash’s quote regarding Hank’s accent in Elvis below:

No. It was more American, more rural. And he had what sounded like a slight lisp or speech impediment. Turns out he had no hurdles – he was just trying to wrap a Dutch language around the English language, Southern style. It sounded like a weird regional (southern) dialect, and you would know it was Dutch only by hearing certain consonants. But Baz wanted to make it seem more “other”. Or as Baz told me in an interview, ‘I thought it was really important that Tom introduce the audience to a weirdness, a sort of ‘What’s going on with this guy?’

Colonel Parker (Tom Hanks) with a cigar in Elvis

Despite the issue of the actor’s accent, raised by Nash, Luhrmann praised Hanks’ performance in Elvis. Speaking of the star in January, Luhrmann complimented his ability to play a “new string on his instrument.” Throughout his career, Hanks has played a variety of characters, but there’s no doubt that Elvis represents something new for the Oscar-winning actor. Hanks’ accent in the film may have raised a few eyebrows, but as Nash pointed out, there was a purpose behind it. Beyond that, Hanks can be commended for trying something very different with his portrayal.

As is the case with most biographical works, there will almost certainly be aspects of Luhrmann’s work Elvis which some dispute. When it comes to the portrayal of Colonel Parker, Nash is able to shine a light on what may or may not be true. Nonetheless, Hanks’ portrayal of Presley’s manager is still a sight to behold. As long as a slight inaccuracy doesn’t trip audiences up, there’s a lot to enjoy about what Hanks brings to Elvis. Fans of the actor can see his full transformation now, as Elvis is looking to make a splash at the box office with its recent release.

More: Elvis Cast Guide: What The Characters Look Like In Real Life

Source: Variety

Top gun maverick sonic 2 the primordial lost city

It’s Not Just Top Gun 2, Paramount Wins 2022 Box Office